It’s tough dealing with toxic people especially when the ones who are toxic hold power. and sadly often those who hold the most power have the least grace.
HUMANE VS. HUMAN
In animal rescue work, there’s a hard truth many people don’t want to hear:
What feels right is not always legal. And what feels wrong is not always illegal.
Rescue lives in that uncomfortable space.
Being humane means acting from compassion stepping in when an animal is scared, injured, or unwanted. It means making fast decisions, sometimes in imperfect conditions, with limited resources, and always with the animal’s best interest at heart.
But the law doesn’t run on compassion. The law runs on definitions, procedures, timelines, and authority.
Something can be deeply humane helping an injured dog, separating animals to prevent harm, taking responsibility when no one else will and still fall outside what the law technically allows. That doesn’t make the act cruel. It makes the system rigid.
At the same time, something can be legally authorized a seizure, a removal, a decision made under “policy” and still feel profoundly wrong. Legal does not always equal ethical. Lawful does not always equal just.
Animal rescue workers live with this tension every day.
We are judged by outcomes without context. By snapshots without timelines. By rules written far from the realities of overcrowded shelters, limited fosters, emergency vet shortages, and animals who don’t fit neatly into checkboxes.
The public often assumes:
If it was done by authorities, it must be right.
If it looks chaotic, it must be negligent.
Both assumptions are wrong.
Rescue is messy because life is messy. Compassion doesn’t always look clean. And legality doesn’t always look humane.
If we truly care about animals, we have to be able to hold two truths at once:
That intent matters.
And that systems can fail even when people try to do good.
Being humane is about minimizing suffering. Being human is about making mistakes while trying to help.
And the real work the hard work is making space for accountability without erasing compassion, and for law without crushing humanity.
Because animals don’t need perfection. They need people who care enough to act even when the line between humane and human is painfully thin.
HUMANE VS HUMAN
There is a quiet truth that every animal rescuer learns the hard way: the law and morality do not always walk hand‑in‑hand.
In rescue work, you see it every day. A dog chained in a yard with no shelter legal. A litter of kittens left outside in the cold because “they’re just barn cats” legal. A rescuer stepping in to save an animal from slow, preventable suffering sometimes not legal at all.
That contradiction is the fault line we stand on: what is right is not always legal, and what is wrong is not always illegal.
Human systems are built on paperwork, procedure, and technicalities. Humane action is built on compassion, urgency, and conscience. And those two worlds collide most violently in animal rescue.
Rescuers are often punished for doing what any decent human would do without hesitation: protect a life, relieve suffering, intervene when no one else will. Meanwhile, the very neglect that forces rescuers to act is often shielded by loopholes, outdated statutes, or agencies that enforce selectively and inconsistently.
The result is a system where:
Suffering can be legal.
Compassion can be criminalized.
And the people doing the right thing are treated as the problem instead of the solution.
But here’s the truth that matters more than any citation or code section: Humanity is not defined by legality. It is defined by the choices we make when a living being is in front of us and we are the only ones who can help.
Animal rescue has always been the work of people who refuse to look away. People who understand that laws evolve, but suffering is immediate. People who know that history has never been kind to those who hid behind “I was just following the rules.”
Being humane means stepping into the gap between what is allowed and what is right and choosing the animal every time.
Because at the end of the day, legality is written on paper. Morality is written in how we treat the vulnerable.
As applications open for the 2025–2026 Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury, we at G&Cs Advocacy and Rescue Corporation want to spotlight why this institution matters not just to watchdogs of government, but to every citizen who believes in transparency, accountability, and justice for the voiceless.
The Civil Grand Jury is a powerful civic body tasked with investigating local government agencies, issuing reports, and recommending reforms. It’s not just about bureaucracy it’s about impact. And for those of us advocating for animal welfare, housing justice, and ethical governance, it’s a tool we cannot afford to ignore.
Christina Urrutia Urena: A Voice for Oversight and Inclusion
Christina Urrutia Urena has long emphasized the importance of community representation in oversight bodies like the Civil Grand Jury. She’s spoken passionately about the need for jurors who understand the lived experiences of marginalized communities including those working in rescue, advocacy, and grassroots service.
In past forums and interviews, Christina has highlighted:
The lack of diversity in Grand Jury panels and how that can skew investigations away from pressing community concerns.
The importance of holding agencies accountable for how they treat vulnerable populations whether that’s unhoused individuals, neglected animals, or underfunded nonprofits.
Her belief that advocates and everyday citizens should apply, not just retired professionals or insiders.
Her message is clear: “If we want the Grand Jury to reflect our values, we need to be in the room.”
Why G&Cs Is Watching Closely
We’ve seen firsthand how local policies affect rescue operations from zoning laws that restrict shelter space to funding decisions that overlook animal welfare. The Grand Jury has the authority to investigate these issues and recommend change. But only if the right people are asking the right questions.
That’s why we’re encouraging our supporters to:
Apply to serve on the 2025–2026 Civil Grand Jury. Applications are open until May 2, 2025.
Attend public meetings and read past Grand Jury reports to understand how decisions are made.
Support advocates like Christina who are pushing for more inclusive civic participation.
Let’s Make Oversight Work for Everyone
The Civil Grand Jury isn’t just a formality it’s a chance to shape the future of Sonoma County. Whether you’re rescuing dogs in Windsor or fighting for fair housing in Santa Rosa, your voice matters. Let’s make sure it’s heard.
Christina Urrutia Urena’s advocacy around the Civil Grand Jury centers on making civic oversight more inclusive, transparent, and responsive to community needs. Here are her key themes:
Main Points from Christina Urrutia Urena
Community Representation Matters Christina emphasizes that the Civil Grand Jury should reflect the diversity of Sonoma County. She advocates for broader participation from everyday citizens not just retirees or professionals especially those involved in grassroots advocacy and rescue work.
Oversight Should Be Accessible She’s called out how intimidating or opaque the Grand Jury process can be for newcomers. Christina pushes for clearer communication, better outreach, and more accessible pathways for people to apply and engage.
Accountability for Local Agencies Christina has consistently urged the Grand Jury to investigate how local government agencies treat vulnerable populations whether that’s unhoused individuals, neglected animals, or underfunded nonprofits. She believes oversight should prioritize ethical treatment and equity.
Empowering Advocates She encourages advocates and rescue workers to apply for the Grand Jury, arguing that their lived experience brings valuable insight to investigations and recommendations.
Transparency in Decision-Making Christina has spoken about the need for public reports and findings to be written in plain language, so that the community can understand and act on them.
Her message is clear: civic oversight isn’t just for insiders it’s for anyone who cares deeply about justice, ethics, and community well-being.
Christina Urrutia Urena’s advocacy for community representation is deeply rooted in her belief that civic institutions like the Civil Grand Jury must reflect the full spectrum of lived experiences in Sonoma County. Here’s a deeper look at her stance: Inclusive Civic Participation
Christina has consistently argued that the Civil Grand Jury should not be dominated by a narrow demographic often retirees or individuals with legal or administrative backgrounds. Instead, she champions the inclusion of:
Multicultural voices Christina emphasizes the need for jurors who understand the cultural nuances of Sonoma County’s diverse population, especially in towns like Windsor and Santa Rosa.
Grassroots advocates People working directly with underserved communities, such as animal rescue volunteers, housing advocates, and social workers.
Residents facing systemic challenges Individuals who’ve experienced housing insecurity, financial hardship, or discrimination whose insights are often missing from formal oversight bodies.
“Oversight without representation is just bureaucracy.”
That’s a paraphrased version of a sentiment she’s shared in community forums and online discussions. Christina believes that when oversight bodies lack representation, they risk overlooking the very issues that matter most to vulnerable populations.
Advocacy Through Action
At G&Cs Advocacy and Rescue Corporation, Christina has modeled this philosophy by:
Offering low-cost boarding and pet food pantries to families in transition.
Expanding foster programs to support shelters in high-kill areas.
Encouraging her team and supporters to apply for civic roles, including the Civil Grand Jury, to bring firsthand experience into public oversight.
Her approach isn’t just about critique it’s about transformation. She wants to see a Grand Jury that doesn’t just investigate from a distance, but listens, learns, and acts with empathy.
Christina Urrutia Urena’s advocacy has had a tangible and far-reaching impact on local policies in Sonoma County, particularly in the realm of animal welfare and civic oversight. Here’s a breakdown of her influence:
🐾 Civil Grand Jury Investigation into Shelter Practices
One of Christina’s most significant contributions was raising a formal citizen complaint to the 2025 Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury. Her complaint catalyzed a county-wide investigation into substandard practices at local shelters. The Grand Jury’s findings supported by Christina’s evidence and testimony highlighted:
Persistent violations of animal care standards
Lack of accountability among shelter operators
Failure to meet transparency benchmarks in public reporting
This led to increased scrutiny of municipal and nonprofit shelters, and sparked conversations about reforming oversight mechanisms for animal services.
Shifting the Narrative Around Rescue Work
Christina’s leadership at G&Cs Advocacy and Rescue Corporation helped redefine what rescue work looks like in Sonoma County. Her team’s efforts have:
Expanded foster programs to high-risk euthanasia zones outside the county
Offered low-cost boarding and pet food pantries for families in crisis
Prioritized keeping pets and people together, especially during housing transitions
These initiatives have influenced local agencies to consider more community-centered models of animal welfare, rather than relying solely on shelter-based solutions.
🗣️ Advocacy Beyond the Insider Circle
Despite resistance from larger nonprofits and municipal leaders, Christina has remained a public whistleblower and reform advocate, pushing for transparency even when it meant being excluded from institutional circles. Her work has inspired:
Grassroots coalitions focused on ethical rescue practices
Philanthropic investment from outside traditional power structures
A growing movement of citizen-led oversight in Sonoma County
Her impact isn’t just procedural—it’s cultural. She’s helped shift the tone of local policy discussions from bureaucratic to empathetic, from reactive to proactive.
A temporary or ad‑hoc hearing officer cannot be neutral if their future employment depends on pleasing the government agency hiring them.
The Court held that this creates an “unacceptable risk of bias” because the officer has a pecuniary interest in ruling for the agency.
How it applies to your facts
Windsor hires the hearing officer.
Windsor pays the hearing officer.
Windsor decides whether to hire them again.
Windsor is also the prosecuting party.
That is the exact configuration Haas prohibits.
Shelter Contract The Town pays the shelter a fixed monthly amount. If the Town loses, it undermines the justification for the seizure and the contract expenditures.
Town Attorney + Hearing Officer Both are paid by the same entity. Even if they are not direct colleagues, they are financially subordinate to the same employer.
Outcome Dependence A ruling against the Town is a ruling against the hearing officer’s own payor and potential future employer.
This is not about proving actual bias. It’s about showing structural bias, which is enough under Haas.
Government Code § 11425.30 — Functional Conflict
This statute bars anyone from serving as a presiding officer if they have acted as an investigator, prosecutor, or advocate in the same proceeding.
You’re not arguing that the hearing officer literally prosecuted the case. You’re arguing that:
Their financial dependency on the same employer as the prosecutor
Creates a functional alignment with the prosecuting agency.
California courts have repeatedly emphasized that the appearance of bias is enough to violate due process.
Commingling of Functions — Nightlife Partners
Nightlife Partners v. Beverly Hills reinforces that when prosecutorial and adjudicative functions are intertwined within the same entity, due process is compromised.
This statute requires that the hearing officer be independent from the seizing agency.
If the hearing officer is:
Paid by the Town
Appointed by the Town
Professionally subordinate to the Town
And the Town is the seizing agency
…then independence is impossible.
I object to the current hearing arrangement on the grounds of systemic financial bias and a violation of the Haas v. County of San Bernardino standard. The Town of Windsor is the employer and payor of the prosecuting attorney, the seizing agency (Animal Control), and the Hearing Officer. This creates an unacceptable risk of pecuniary bias because the Hearing Officer’s continued employment and future assignments are financially dependent on the same entity that initiated and seeks to uphold the seizure.
Under Haas, a temporary or ad-hoc hearing officer who relies on the appointing agency for future work has a disqualifying pecuniary interest. Additionally, the Town’s unified control over both prosecutorial and adjudicative functions constitutes impermissible commingling under Nightlife Partners v. Beverly Hills. The arrangement also violates the independence requirement of Penal Code § 597.1(f)(6) and the functional neutrality requirements of Government Code § 11425.30.
For these reasons, I respectfully move to disqualify the Hearing Officer for cause.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Hello my name is and I am writing to you regarding concerns about the unconditional and inhumane behavior of the town of Windsor’s police department and it’s officers. Currently I there is an investigation in which I am receiving help form internal affairs but some times things are done and and I need that help after is to late or the damage is undoable. For starters out of retaliation for the investigation Windsor pd has routinely harassed my home coming onto private property to tag a car I am going to register on the first when my SSI comes in . It is parked on my lawn and dose not hinder block or violate any law I say that after getting bit educated from CHP animal control has been called when my dog barks at all he’s a dog that’s what they do it is not constant nor is it continual it is normal barking my neighbor is an officer who has attempted to steal my dog and has told me if I do not get my shit together he will take my dog and I will have to watch my dog be his those are his words. I have cameras both visual and not that pick up EVERYTHING and will be handing the footage too Mr. Mike McGuire on April 5th when he meets with me personally. This has gone on far too long the racist and prejudice behavior of the officers is unacceptable unconstitutional and humane and tolerable this will not be accepted any longer these officers are in dire need of some training and refreshment of just what it means of being an officer as County council members you guys promised and owe it to us to see that these true hoodlums are put into check and kept there I trust that there won’t be any more incidences where you have failed members of the community once more I have watched County council meetings and have a small amount but still nonetheless I hope that you will do what’s up right and you will respect this concern and look into it not just push it aside like matters relating to the last mayor one way or another there will be equality in this town there will be mutual respect and there will be no abuse of power under the color of law by any government official I trust that you have the same goal in mind and I look forward to speaking with you as well as experiencing the change that will come from this email thank you and have a blessed day
From: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 7:16 AM To: Debora Fudge <dfudge@townofwindsor.com> Cc: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com> Subject: Re:
Good morning Deb
Yes we are aware, thank you for forwarding. Kristina has been in discussion with animal control about this for several days. I’m going to ask her to prepare a memo as there are many details and other Councilmembers also inquired.
Thank you
Jon Davis
Town Manager
Town of Windsor
On Oct 3, 2023, at 9:14 PM, Debora Fudge <dfudge@townofwindsor.com> wrote:
Are you aware of all of this?
Deb
From:
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 4:41 PM
To: Debora Fudge <dfudge@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Re:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
North Bay Animal Services in Petaluma came to my home when my dogs got out of the yard and took 5 of my dogs.
At the time, I was under the impression that I had no other choice but to give up my dogs. If
I knew, I had the choice to say no, I would have.
Later I spoke with Mark Scott the director of North Bay Animal Services and I feel that I was persuaded to sign a surrender agreement, Mark manipulated me by telling me if I didn’t do the right thing now, if I put up barriers then he could not help me and that I would end up losing everything and that he was trying to save me.
He said he just wanted to help me get them fixed and that I could find them homes as I was clear that I wanted the dogs I couldnt keep due to there being a limit on the number of dogs a house a can have to be homed with family and friends so that I could remain in their lives.
I am emotionally disabled and suffer from social anxiety, ptsd, aspergers, and ADD and verbal communication is one of my greatest struggles.
I feel that Mark tricked me by intentionally giving me misleading information so that I would agree to let him “help”
Since my dogs have been gone I have slipped into a depression that I am unable to shake, I email and call and neither are responded to.
I went to Petaluma to get my dogs and the shelter said that my dogs were in the back where the public does not have access to. I called the petaluma police department and the officers claimed to not have the authority to have North Bay Animal Services give me my dogs.
Mark at one point was on the phone and said that if I was calm I could see my dogs but
the shelter staff didnt not follow through and then told the police that the dogs were not there. Mark insisted that I go to windsor and talk to him I told him that there was nothing to talk about I wanted my dogs and that wasnt going to change. My disabilities are the barrier that makes verbal communication difficult and it is unfair to demand me to “push” through them and do as mark is asking.
My request is clear and firm I want my dogs I do not want them at North Bay the shelter has a lot of shady aspects and I do not want my dogs being the next death by mistake or any other possible misfortune outcome.
I feel that petaluma police were bias as they and Mark are in the same line of work and its like a club member pack. I feel that my disabilities made me an easy target and that were used against me to get me to allow mark to take my dogs,
Mark says a lot of good stuff and makes promises that sound like everything is going to be ok but there is no follow through and I do not feel comfortable with my animals in his care,
I want to appeal and will keep doing so until my dogs are returned whatever I need to do to get them back will be done,
I dont want to take the road to filing a law suit but if there is no action by the end of the week that will be my next move.
I have reached out to members of government and will be sending over copies of every email letter video and any other piece of evidence to the media.
I am not trying to be cause trouble I just want my dogs back with shelters being over filled and there being so many animals at risk of being killed I am unable to see why returning my dogs is so hard for mark to do. If resources are so limited why fight to spread yourself thinner the only thing I can think is that like any other business an animal shelter needs animals to in order to get funding and to gain the support of the community I went to mark before about two puppies that were found in a parking lot in lake county and he said that it was out of jurisdiction even though his organization services lake county as well he told me to basically tell the lady sorry and send the pups back with her because resources were so limited but then the following week went to a county he does not service using county transportation to get 12 dogs im not sure the number but it can be found in the newspaper because of course it was a nice touch and story for the public.
I just want my dogs and I won’t stop until I have them back. I will keep emailing and requesting audits, court records, background checks and other reports and I will share with the public everything I learn.
What is happening is not right and something needs to be done anybody of government that has the power to help and chooses to look the other way is guilty as well and will added to any lawsuit that may arise for being in conspiracy to abuse power under the color of law and acting in ways that cause severe mental distress to a disabled individual who didn’t have the mental ability to understand the situation and had no advocate, for learning of those disabilities and continuing to allow this cruel and unusual treatment.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 3:36 AM wrote:
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to share my story and explain why I believe the town ordinance relating to the number of dogs a home can have should be amended. Recently, animal control took the offspring from my dog, which I hold very close to my heart. I’m emotionally disabled, and working with my dogs is therapeutic for me.
I believe ordinances should be amended to focus on the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of dogs allowed. This would also help with the overpopulation
in shelters and other animal control issues. More programs need to be made available for people like myself who want to retain their animals rather than putting them into overcrowded shelters.
The current ordinance is limiting the love and care I can offer my animals. I’m certain there are others facing the same issue. I respectfully request the council consider amending the ordinance to focus more on the quality of care than the number of animals a person can have.
I believe that the town ordinances should be centered around the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of animals allowed for house with shelters being overpopulated and thousands of animals losing their lives every year to reasons relating to a lack of space and resources it only would seem logical that individuals be allowed to house more than four animals in their home as long as those animals are loved cared for insecure also though it is understandable that no one wants to hear excessive barking or smell excessive smells that come from dogs using the bathroom ordinances need to be a little more relaxed and understanding that these are animals living breathing creatures not something that you can just mold in force to conform to fit your desired needs if you don’t want to hear barking don’t get a dog if you don’t want to smell dog feces complaints made regarding animals are made too often and I believe that the town entertaining them is bias and unfair just to take all of the ordinances into mine for a brief second it would seem as though Windsor has become an anti-domestic animal town as it makes it difficult for individuals who are putting their time and energy into good use out to be criminals and the targets of different agency attacks.
Programs that claim to help an animals and their owners like spay and neuter programs need to be made actually be available for individuals I have tried for a year straight every month logging on to the website of the humane society of Sonoma county to get my dog spayed and neutered and the calendar that is provided on the website is always out at least 6 months this is a not matter no matter when I go on it is always the same thing I call the organizations in the surrounding area and everybody is booked out at least 9 months my question is is that with all the funding and grants that are handed out to these places where is that money going if it’s not going to
From: SCASDispatch
To:
Subject: FW: Question or Comment: Now, Duck(s)
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2020 8:37:28 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Message: You were most helpful when we needed to report our neighbor’s constantly-barking German shepherd dog. The dog has decreased in its barking, after you sent a letter to its owners. Now, our neighbor has purchased at least one domestic duck for their backyard. As duck hunters, we recognize the quackings of the duck(s). The German shepherd is still on the premises. We have 5400 square foot properties, which are considered small. Are duck(s) allowed in small, residential neighborhoods in Windsor? The Town of Windsor advised me to contact you with our question. I formerly lived on acreage in Sebastopol, and kept ducks, geese, chickens, sheep, a rabbit, one horse, and 33 bee hives, all of which I tended. I love animals, but it seems strange to have “farm” animals on small, city properties which are separated from one another by ten feet. Thank you for your response.
From: Debora Fudge
To: Jon Davis
Subject: Fwd:
Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 9:14:00 PM
Are you aware of all of this?
Deb
From:
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 4:41 PM
To: Debora Fudge <dfudge@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Re:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
North Bay Animal Services in Petaluma came to my home when my dogs got out of the yard and took 5 of my dogs.
At the time, I was under the impression that I had no other choice but to give up my dogs. If I knew, I had the choice to say no, I would have.
Later I spoke with Mark Scott the director of North Bay Animal Services and I feel that I was persuaded to sign a surrender agreement, Mark manipulated me by telling me if I didn’t do the right thing now, if I put up barriers then he could not help me and that I would end up losing everything and that he was trying to save me.
He said he just wanted to help me get them fixed and that I could find them homes as I was clear that I wanted the dogs I couldnt keep due to there being a limit on the number of dogs a house a can have to be homed with family and friends so that I could remain in their lives. I am emotionally disabled and suffer from social anxiety, ptsd, aspergers, and ADD and
verbal communication is one of my greatest struggles.
I feel that Mark tricked me by intentionally giving me misleading information so that I would agree to let him “help”
Since my dogs have been gone I have slipped into a depression that I am unable to shake, I email and call and neither are responded to.
I went to Petaluma to get my dogs and the shelter said that my dogs were in the back where the public does not have access to. I called the petaluma police department and the officers claimed to not have the authority to have North Bay Animal Services give me my dogs.
Mark at one point was on the phone and said that if I was calm I could see my dogs but the shelter staff didnt not follow through and then told the police that the dogs were not there. Mark insisted that I go to windsor and talk to him I told him that there was nothing to talk about I wanted my dogs and that wasnt going to change. My disabilities are the barrier that
makes verbal communication difficult and it is unfair to demand me to “push” through them and do as mark is asking.
My request is clear and firm I want my dogs I do not want them at North Bay the shelter has a lot of shady aspects and I do not want my dogs being the next death by mistake or any other possible misfortune outcome.
I feel that petaluma police were bias as they and Mark are in the same line of work and its like a club member pack. I feel that my disabilities made me an easy target and that were used against me to get me to allow mark to take my dogs,
Mark says a lot of good stuff and makes promises that sound like everything is going to be ok but there is no follow through and I do not feel comfortable with my animals in his care, I want to appeal and will keep doing so until my dogs are returned whatever I need to do to get them back will be done,
I dont want to take the road to filing a law suit but if there is no action by the end of the week that will be my next move.
I have reached out to members of government and will be sending over copies of every email letter video and any other piece of evidence to the media.
I am not trying to be cause trouble I just want my dogs back with shelters being over filled and there being so many animals at risk of being killed I am unable to see why returning my dogs is so hard for mark to do. If resources are so limited why fight to spread yourself thinner the only thing I can think is that like any other business an animal shelter needs animals to in order to get funding and to gain the support of the community I went to mark before about two puppies that were found in a parking lot in lake county and he said that it was out of jurisdiction even though his organization services lake county as well he told me to basically tell the lady sorry and send the pups back with her because resources were so limited but then the following week went to a county he does not service using county transportation to get 12 dogs im not sure the number but it can be found in the newspaper because of course it was a nice touch and story for the public.
I just want my dogs and I won’t stop until I have them back. I will keep emailing and requesting audits, court records, background checks and other reports and I will share with the public everything I learn.
What is happening is not right and something needs to be done anybody of government that has the power to help and chooses to look the other way is guilty as well and will added to any lawsuit that may arise for being in conspiracy to abuse power under the color of law and acting in ways that cause severe mental distress to a disabled individual who didn’t have the mental ability to understand the situation and had no advocate, for learning of those disabilities and continuing to allow this cruel and unusual treatment.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 3:36 AM
wrote:
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to share my story and explain why I believe the town ordinance relating to the number of dogs a home can have should be amended. Recently, animal control took the offspring from my dog, which I hold very close to my heart. I’m emotionally disabled, and working with my dogs is therapeutic for me.
I believe ordinances should be amended to focus on the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of dogs allowed. This would also help with the overpopulation in shelters and other animal control issues. More programs need to be made available for people like myself who want to retain their animals rather than putting them into overcrowded shelters.
The current ordinance is limiting the love and care I can offer my animals. I’m certain there are others facing the same issue. I respectfully request the council consider amending the ordinance to focus more on the quality of care than the number of animals a person can have.
I believe that the town ordinances should be centered around the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of animals allowed for house with shelters being overpopulated and thousands of animals losing their lives every year to reasons relating to a lack of space and resources it only would seem logical that individuals be allowed to house more than four animals in their home as long as those animals are loved cared for insecure also though it is understandable that no one wants to hear excessive barking or smell excessive smells that come from dogs using the bathroom ordinances need to be a little more relaxed and understanding that these are animals living breathing creatures not something that you can just mold in force to conform to fit your desired needs if you don’t want to hear barking don’t get a dog if you don’t want to smell dog feces complaints made regarding animals are made too often and I believe that the town entertaining them is bias and unfair just to take all of the ordinances into mine for a brief second it would seem as though Windsor has become an anti-domestic animal town as it makes it difficult for individuals who are putting their time and energy into good use out to be criminals and the targets of different agency attacks.
Programs that claim to help an animals and their owners like spay and neuter programs need to be made actually be available for individuals I have tried for a year straight every month logging on to the website of the humane society of Sonoma county to get my dog spayed and neutered and the calendar that is provided on the website is always out at least 6 months this is a not matter no matter when I go on it is always the same thing I call the organizations in the surrounding area and everybody is booked out at least 9 months my question is is that with all the funding and grants that are handed out to these places where is that money going if it’s not going to
From: Jon Davis
To: Debora Fudge
Cc:
Subject: Re:
Date: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 7:16:30 AM
Good morning Deb
Yes we are aware, thank you for forwarding. has been in discussion with animal control about this for several days. I’m going to ask her to prepare a memo as there are many details and other Councilmembers also inquired.
Thank you
Jon Davis
Town Manager
Town of Windsor
On Oct 3, 2023, at 9:14 PM, Debora Fudge <dfudge@townofwindsor.com> wrote:
Are you aware of all of this?
Deb
From:
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 4:41 PM
To: Debora Fudge <dfudge@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Re:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
North Bay Animal Services in Petaluma came to my home when my dogs got out of the yard and took 5 of my dogs.
At the time, I was under the impression that I had no other choice but to give up my dogs. If
I knew, I had the choice to say no, I would have.
Later I spoke with Mark Scott the director of North Bay Animal Services and I feel that I was persuaded to sign a surrender agreement, Mark manipulated me by telling me if I didn’t do the right thing now, if I put up barriers then he could
not help me and that I would end up losing everything and that he was trying to save me.
He said he just wanted to help me get them fixed and that I could find them homes as I was clear that I wanted the dogs I couldnt keep due to there being a limit on the number of dogs a house a can have to be homed with family and friends so that I could remain in their lives.
I am emotionally disabled and suffer from social anxiety, ptsd, aspergers, and ADD and verbal communication is one of my greatest struggles. I feel that Mark tricked me by intentionally giving me misleading information so that I would agree to let him “help”
Since my dogs have been gone I have slipped into a depression that I am unable to shake, I email and call and neither are responded to. I went to Petaluma to get my dogs and the shelter said that my dogs were in the back where the public does not have access to. I called the petaluma police department and the officers claimed to not have the authority to have North Bay Animal Services give me my dogs.
Mark at one point was on the phone and said that if I was calm I could see my dogs but the shelter staff didnt not follow through and then told the police that the dogs were not there. Mark insisted that I go to windsor and talk to him I told him that there was nothing to talk about I wanted my dogs and that wasnt going to change. My disabilities are the barrier that makes verbal communication difficult and it is unfair to demand me to “push” through them and do as mark is asking.
My request is clear and firm I want my dogs I do not want them at North Bay the shelter has a lot of shady aspects and I do not want my dogs being the next death by mistake or any other possible misfortune outcome.
I feel that petaluma police were bias as they and Mark are in the same line of work and its like a club member pack. I feel that my disabilities made me an easy target and that were used against me to get me to allow mark to take my dogs,
Mark says a lot of good stuff and makes promises that sound like everything is going to be ok but there is no follow through and I do not feel comfortable with my animals in his care,
I want to appeal and will keep doing so until my dogs are returned whatever I need to do to get them back will be done,
I dont want to take the road to filing a law suit but if there is no action by the end of the week that will be my next move.
I have reached out to members of government and will be sending over copies of every email letter video and any other piece of evidence to the media. I am not trying to be cause trouble I just want my dogs back with shelters being
over filled and there being so many animals at risk of being killed I am unable to see why returning my dogs is so hard for mark to do. If resources are so limited why fight to spread yourself thinner the only thing I can think is that like any other business an animal shelter needs animals to in order to get funding and to gain the support of the community I went to mark before about two puppies that were found in a parking lot in lake county and he said that it was out of jurisdiction even though his organization services lake county as well he told me to basically tell the lady sorry and send the pups back with her because resources were so limited but then the following week went to a county he does not service using county transportation to get 12 dogs im not sure the number but it can be found in the newspaper because of course it was a nice touch and story for the public.
I just want my dogs and I won’t stop until I have them back. I will keep emailing and requesting audits, court records, background checks and other reports and I will share with the public everything I learn.
What is happening is not right and something needs to be done anybody of government that has the power to help and chooses to look the other way is guilty as well and will added to any lawsuit that may arise for being in conspiracy to abuse power under the color of law and acting in ways that cause severe mental distress to a disabled individual who didn’t have the mental ability to understand the situation and had no advocate, for learning of those disabilities and continuing to allow this cruel and unusual treatment.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 3:36 AM
wrote:
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to share my story and explain why I believe the town ordinance relating to the number of dogs a home can have should be amended. Recently, animal control took the offspring from my dog, which I hold very close to my heart. I’m emotionally disabled, and working with my dogs is therapeutic for me.
I believe ordinances should be amended to focus on the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of dogs allowed. This would also help with the overpopulation in shelters and other animal control issues. More programs need to be made available for people like myself who want to retain their animals rather than putting them into overcrowded shelters.
The current ordinance is limiting the love and care I can offer my animals. I’m certain there are others facing the same issue. I respectfully request the council consider amending the ordinance to focus more on the quality of care
than the number of animals a person can have.
I believe that the town ordinances should be centered around the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of animals allowed for house with shelters being overpopulated and thousands of animals losing their lives every year to reasons relating to a lack of space and resources it only would seem logical that individuals be allowed to house more than four animals in their home as long as those animals are loved cared for insecure also though it is understandable that no one wants to hear excessive barking or smell excessive smells that come from dogs using the bathroom ordinances need to be a little more relaxed and understanding that these are animals living breathing creatures not something that you can just mold in force to conform to fit your desired needs if you don’t want to hear barking don’t get a dog if you don’t want to smell dog feces complaints made regarding animals are made too often and I believe that the town entertaining them is bias and unfair just to take all of the ordinances into mine for a brief second it would seem as though Windsor has become an anti-domestic animal town as it makes it difficult for individuals who are putting their time and energy into good use out to be criminals and the targets of different agency attacks. Programs that claim to help an animals and their owners like spay and neuter programs need to be made actually be available for individuals I have tried for a year straight every month logging on to the website of the humane society of Sonoma county to get my dog spayed and neutered and the calendar that is provided on the website is always out at least 6 months this is a not matter no matter when I go on it is always the same thing I call the organizations in the surrounding area and everybody is booked out at least 9 months my question is is that with all the funding and grants that are handed out to these places where is that money going if it’s not going to
P Please consider the environment before printing this email
From: Rosa Reynoza <rreynoza@townofwindsor.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 6:15 AM
To: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Fwd:
Good morning.
Can you look into this?
Please share the ordinance with me at our next meet up.
Thank you
Get Outlook for iOS
From:
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 3:36 AM
To: Rosa Reynoza <rreynoza@townofwindsor.com>
Subject:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to share my story and explain why I believe the town ordinance relating to the number of dogs a home can have should be amended. Recently, animal control took the offspring from my dog, which I hold very close to my heart. I’m emotionally disabled, and working with my dogs is therapeutic for me.
I believe ordinances should be amended to focus on the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of dogs allowed. This would also help with the overpopulation in shelters and other animal control issues. More programs need to be made available for people like myself who want to retain their animals rather than putting them into overcrowded shelters.
The current ordinance is limiting the love and care I can offer my animals. I’m certain there are others facing the same issue. I respectfully request the council consider amending the ordinance to focus more on the quality of care than the number of animals a person can have.
I believe that the town ordinances should be centered around the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of animals allowed for house with shelters being overpopulated and thousands of animals losing their lives every year to reasons relating to a lack of space and resources it only would seem logical that individuals be allowed to house more than four animals in their home as long as those animals are loved cared for insecure also though it is understandable that no one wants to hear excessive barking or smell excessive smells that come from dogs using the bathroom ordinances need to be a little more relaxed and understanding that these are animals living breathing creatures not something that you can just mold in force to conform to fit your desired needs if you don’t want to hear barking don’t get a dog if you don’t want to smell dog feces complaints made regarding animals are made too often and I believe that the town entertaining them is bias and unfair just to take all of the ordinances into mine for a brief second it would seem as though Windsor has become an anti-domestic animal town as it makes it difficult for individuals who are putting their time and energy into good use out to be criminals and the targets of different agency attacks.
Programs that claim to help an animals and their owners like spay and neuter programs need to be made actually be available for individuals I have tried for a year straight every month logging on to the website of the humane society of Sonoma county to get my dog spayed and neutered and the calendar that is provided on the website is always out at least 6 months this is a not matter no matter when I go on it is always the same thing I call the organizations in the surrounding area and everybody is booked out at least 9 months my question is is that with all the funding and grants that are handed out to these places where is that money going if it’s not going to
To: ‘Mickie Tagle’; Mark@northbayanimalservices.org; Ruben Martinez
Subject: RE: Call re: Barking Dog History
Hi Mickie,
I just emailed Mark and asked if we can meet next week, either Wednesday or Thursday.
Thank you,
Ruben
Chief Ruben Martinez
Town of Windsor Police Department
9291 Old Redwood Highway Suite 300 B
Windsor CA 95492
(707) 838-1234
Ruben.Martinez@sonoma-county.org
Confidential Communication
The information in this email is confidential and as such may be protected by law, per 832.7 of the California Penal Code. If you are not the intended recipient please contact sender and delete this email.
From: Mark@northbayanimalservices.org <Mark@northbayanimalservices.org> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 1:29 PM
To: Mickie Tagle <mtagle@townofwindsor.com>; Ruben Martinez
<rmartinezjr@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: RE: Call re: Barking Dog History
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
To: Ruben Martinez; Mark Scott (mark@northbayanimalservices.org)
Subject: Call re: Barking Dog History
Hello Chief and Mark,
Please let me know when works for you to have a call and provide best number to reach you.
Per Ken’s request, I’m coordinating a call between you two. will be making a complaint on July 1st when North Bay Animal Services begins servicing Windsor regarding a recurring issue with a barking door next door to his home. Prior to that day, Ken requested that Chief Martinez provide Mark with a heads up and some history.
THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY EMAIL SYSTEM. Warning: If you don’t know this email sender or the email is unexpected, do not click any web links, attachments, and never give out your user ID or password.
THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY EMAIL SYSTEM. Warning: If you don’t know this email sender or the email is unexpected, do not click any web links, attachments, and never give out your user ID or password.
From: Mickie Tagle
To: Ken MacNab
Cc: Ruben Martinez
Subject: RE: North Bay Animal Services – Pending Complaint from
Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 5:11:35 PM
Hello Ken,
Mark’s ready for a call with us any time to review the history of barking dog complaint. Also, all is going well. Mark and his team are eager to start as soon as yesterday! Mark joked about being ready to go with or without the contract. Case in point, a Windsor resident already called today to ask if they would take kittens. The county phone line just kept ringing and the local vets wouldn’t take them. Mark said, yes and NBAS is now taking care of the kitties. With all that said, we’re on track for NBAS to take over and start by July 1st.
Following is what’s on our list of action items that per Mark, it’s not necessary to complete by the 1st:
1. From Windsor:
a. Copy of executed contract. (Jule is on it and near the end of completing the process) b. Replace info on our website from county to NBAS. (I’ll take care of it.)
2. From the County:
a. Transfer of licenses from the county. (I’m on a call with them tomorrow. Allegedly, it’s a complicated process.)
b. Photo of existing license tags to ensure NBAS gets the same style for consistency. (I’m on it.)
c. Success number of license tags. (I’m on it.)
3. From NBAS:
a. Marketing materials – NBAS has a great team of volunteer marketing folks already in the works re: announcement to the websites and social media; FAQs/Brochures re: here’s how you can license a dog, here’s where to neuter; Mark’s happy to share all their marketing materials with us as they create it for our review, edits, and creative input.
b. Windsor Vets – Mark reached out to one already but vets they didn’t seem interested. Mark said that due to shelter in place, lots of folks are taking their pets to vets. Vets are overwhelmed and not taking on more clients. Maybe now is not the time to reach out. He’ll give it some time before he reaches out again.
c. Windsor Animal Control Officer – Mark’s already got someone ready to start but he’s got an ad out for another one. Ideally, he would like to hire a bilingual Windsor resident. He’ll give us the link to the job posting, in case we wish to share on our social media.
FYI
Respectfully,
Mickie Tagle
COVID-19 Emergency Operations Center – Emergency Coordinator, Liaison, & Public Information Officer
Subject: North Bay Animal Services – Pending Complaint from
Hi Mickie
Councilmember Salmon asked about the status of transition to our new animal services vendor. I shared last I heard the process had begun and was off to a good start. Can you please give me an update I can share.
ALSO – has had a long-standing concern about a barking dog near his home. He indicated he is waiting for NBAS to assume responsibilities to make his next complaint. We may want to sit down with the Chief and NBAS to give them a heads up and some history. If the Chief can access County animal control records that might be helpful.
Ken
From: Patrick Streeter
To: Jon Davis
Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Other Question or Concern
Date: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 9:36:49 AM
Attachments:
Complaint forms attached – these are confidential.
Patrick N. Streeter, AICP | Community Development Director
Town of Windsor |9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg. 400|Windsor, CA 95492 707-838-1000 Main via Text or Phone | 707-838-5313 Direct| 707 838-7349 Fax http://www.townofwindsor.com
From: Patrick Streeter
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 9:33 AM
To: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Other Question or Concern
Yes, we have a complaint that was filed 8/15/23. Following inspection, the following violations were identified:
Substandard conditions / junk and rubbish / human occupied RV & structures
A Preliminary Notice was posted on the property, and it has been scheduled for an administrative hearing to take place on 10/11/23.
Patrick N. Streeter, AICP | Community Development Director
Town of Windsor |9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg. 400|Windsor, CA 95492 707-838-1000 Main via Text or Phone | 707-838-5313 Direct| 707 838-7349 Fax http://www.townofwindsor.com
From: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 9:17 AM
To: Patrick Streeter <pstreeter@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: Other Question or Concern
To: Town Clerk Distribution Group <dist_townclerk@townofwindsor.com> Subject: Online Form Submittal: Other Question or Concern
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Other Question or Concern
Do you have a question or concern, but not sure which Department to ask? Let us know and we will direct your question to the appropriate Department.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Physical Address if
applicable
Question or Concern file a grievance against multiple parties, one being a neighbor who is a law enforcement officer, and another against the town of
Windsor. there is a long history of tension, harassment, and
resentment between officer McCracken and myself and started
off in a negative manor for reasons unknown to me. from the first
interaction between the two of us he has always been hostel
yelling and swearing about my dog that would get out and ended
up being poisioned when i had filed a complaint against him he
reacted in a childish way telling my mother in law that “:
went to my job and got me in trouble so im not talking to her
anymore if that dog gets out again it will be an issue that i will
deal with in my way”at the time the fence our properties share
needed to be redone as his grandmother the last owner of the
house didnt respond to our bringing it needing to be done up so
my mother in law went ahead and paid to have the fence done
feel that the town’s role in all of this and it’s position is bias unfair
and prejudice i feel that the town in acting on the behalf of a
fellow civil servant and treating myself as well as those who live
in the household unfair and unjust, i have file many complaints
against windsor pd for harassment violations of civil rights and
liberties and for abusing their power under the color of law which
i now feel the town of windsor is doing also after 30 years now
code enforcement is accusing the owners of violations
Attach Document Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Hi Mark,
Following up on this complaint. Please call me.
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
From: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 10:03 AM
To: Animal Services (mark@northbayanimalservices.org) <mark@northbayanimalservices.org> Cc: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Windsor Animal Services – Complaint
Hello,
The Town received a concern regarding barking and sanitary conditions at . Based on the complaint from , the resident fosters animals, barking occurs all day until the dog is let inside, sanitary conditions have become an issue for neighbors to sit outside, and lastly, the number of permanent animals is 5+.
Can you let me know the steps to take to report and request a visit to the location? Do I just send an email to you or report in another form?
Thank you,
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
provided that such dog has been vaccinated consistent with the requirements of thissection and its owner presents proof of such vaccination upon demand and furtherprovided that such dog is confined on the premises of the person in charge of it while inthe Town except when being groomed, trained, bred, shown, exhibited, or in competition.
3-4-1400 – Mandatory Spay or Neutering for All Dogs at Large.
Except as provided in subsections (a) through (g) of this section, all owners cited for dogsrunning at large for violation ofSection 3-4-1025 shall have their dog spayed and neuteredat the owner’s expense.
a. Dogs documented as having been appropriately trained and actually being used bypublic law enforcement agencies for law enforcement activities, or such dogs designatedas breeding stock by an appropriate agency or organized approved by the Animal ControlOfficer after consultation with knowledgeable professionals;
b. Dogs documented as having been appropriately trained and actually being used asan assistance dog, such as a service dog, guide dog, signal dog, or social dog, orsuch dogs designated as breeding stock by an appropriate agency or organizationapproved by the Animal Control Officer after consultation with knowledgeableprofessionals;
c. Dogs documented as having been appropriately trained and actually being used bysearch and rescue agencies for search and rescue activities, or such dogsdesignated as breeding stock by an appropriate agency or organization approvedby the director after consultation with knowledgeable professionals;
d. Dogs certified by a licensed veterinarian as having a health reason for not beingspayed/neutered;
e.
Dogs which are appropriately trained and actually being used for herding of other animals,or as livestock guardian dogs, hunting dogs, or such dogs designated as breeding stockby an appropriate agency or organization approved by the Animal Control Officer afterconsultation with knowledgeable professionals;
f.
Dogs boarded in a licensed kennel or a business, which boards such animals forprofessional training or resale;
g.
Dogs which are registered with the American Kennel Club, United Kingdom Kennel Club,and/or American Dog Breeders Association Incorporated and trained and kept for thepurpose of show, field trials and agility trials.
3-4-1405 – Mandatory Spay or Neutering of All Pit Bulls.
No person shall own, harbor, or keep within the Town, a pit bull over the age of four (4)months, which has not been spayed or neutered, except as provided in Sections3-4-1400(a) through (g).
3-4-1025 – Dogs At Large Prohibited—Exceptions.
No person shall cause, permit, or allow any dog to run at large upon any public street orother public place, or upon any private property or premises other than those of the owneror other person in control of such dog, nor shall any person cause, permit, or allow anydog to be upon any public street or other public place unless the dog is restrained by asubstantial leash, except:
a. When such dog is assisting a law enforcement officer in the performance of police work.
b. When such dog is assisting a duly authorized person in an official search and rescue operation.
c.When such dog is assisting the owner in working, herding, or controlling livestock.
d. When such dog is assisting the owner in hunting on private property with the consent of the owner, lessee or other person in control thereof.
e. When such dog is participating in a dog training class, exhibition or competition, or an ongoing training program related thereto, under the direction and control of a dog trainer or other qualified person on public property with the consent of the owner or operator of the grounds or facilities, or on private property with the consent of the owner, lessee or other person in control thereof.
f. When such dog is accompanying the owner or other person in control of such dog on private property with the consent of the owner, lessee, or other person in control thereof.
Mark Scott
Executive Director
North Bay Animal Services
mark@northbayanimalservices.org
707-364-9554
From: Kristina Owens
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 3:32 PM
To: Animal Services (mark@northbayanimalservices.org)
Subject: Windsor Case
Hi Mark,
I wanted to provide my email address to push this item to the top of your inbox.
If you could respond with a quick recap and documentation regarding , I would appreciate it.
I will follow up with Code Enforcement and the Windsor Police Department as well. Unfortunately, I was directed not to forward the email submitted to Councilmember Fudge.
In the meantime, if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Thank you,
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
Subject: RE: Windsor Hastings Place Case
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Hi Kristina,
What’s the address on and what is the person(s) name(s)?
From: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 3:55 PM
To: Michael Raasch <mraasch@townofwindsor.com>
Cc: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: FW: Windsor Hastings Place Case
EXTERNAL
Hi Mike,
Council and the Mayor received an email regarding a code enforcement issue on . I assume it is without getting verification from Mark Scott – animal control. Based on the email, North Bay Animal Services tricked the resident into surrendering her animals while Mark Scott states otherwise.
Furthermore, Mark states that a scheduled court hearing is coming up and being handled by Town Code Enforcement. Next email to Robert Smith and his crew.
Do you have any information regarding this person or visits to the property on Hastings that will assist with a memo I need to present to the Council by Friday?
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
From: Kristina Owens
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 3:33 PM
To: Animal Services (mark@northbayanimalservices.org) <mark@northbayanimalservices.org> Subject: Windsor Case
Hi Mark,
I wanted to provide my email address to push this item to the top of your inbox.
If you could respond with a quick recap and documentation regarding , I would appreciate it.
I will follow up with Code Enforcement and the Windsor Police Department as well. Unfortunately, I was directed not to forward the email submitted to Councilmember Fudge.
In the meantime, if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Thank you,
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY EMAIL SYSTEM. Warning: If you don’t know this email sender or the email is unexpected,
do not click any web links, attachments, and never give out your user ID or password.
THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY EMAIL SYSTEM. Warning: If you don’t know this email sender or the email is unexpected,
do not click any web links, attachments, and never give out your user ID or password.
From:
To: Rosa Reynoza
Subject: Re:
Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 1:37:45 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
This email is on behalf of who is the legal owner of the following dogs: six lab puppies aged between one year and five months, as well as six three-week-old puppies. 6 puppiesThe purpose of this letter is to inform you that the
surrender agreement previously signed with North Bay Animal Services (NAS) is to be considered null and void.
It has come to our attention that the surrender agreement was signed under circumstances that infringed upon the rights of the owner, who lacks the mental capacity to understand the implications of such an agreement. Additionally, their caregiver, who serves as a witness, was not present during the signing, further raising concerns about the validity of the decision to surrender the animals.
According to the CDC individuals with ASD operate in ways that differ from those without ASD, from the way they communicate, interact and learn, Usually there is not physical detector to a person who has ASD and the abilities of these individuals vary significantly, some may have strong communication skills either in verbal p or written, some need more help than others in day to day activities some may live on their own and some may need to live in supportive housing
People with ASD are usually known to stop learning new skills after the age of 24 mos some may learn new skills and then lose them, causing them to need to relearn them and that can be very stressful on the person.
Diagnosis for ASD can be difficult as there are no tests to test a person.
There are however common signs of those who have ASD ranging from emotional behaviors and reactions to communication skills to learning abilities. Not all people with ASD show all the same signs, some are higher functioning and ASD shows up differently in males and females. ASD individuals may have other
conditions like anxiety, depression, or ADHD. the attention of healthcare providers because they also have conditions such as anxiety, depression, or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, which occur more often in people with ASD than in people without ASD.
People with ASD have behaviors or interests that can seem unusual. These behaviors or interests set ASD apart from conditions defined by problems with social communication and interaction. It is important to note that a person with ASD might not react the same way in different situations and may have an easier time interacting with some people more than others, they may start off seeming ok then suddenly get overstimulated and shut down or even have a meltdown.
Examples of restricted or repetitive behaviors and interests related to ASD can includeRepeats words or phrases over and over (called echolalia
Gets upset by minor changes
Has obsessive interests
Must follow certain routines
Flaps hands, rocks body, or spins self in circles
Has unusual reactions to the way things sound, smell, taste, look, or feel other related characteristics.
Gastrointestinal issues (for example, constipation)
Unusual mood or emotional reactions
Anxiety, stress, or excessive worry
Lack of fear or more fear than expected
Considering these factors, we request the immediate release of the lab puppies as secured by the voiding of the surrender agreement between and NAS. We expect North Bay Animal Services to uphold the laws that protect the rights of individuals with disabilities and to act accordingly in this matter.
We understand that some of the dogs need new homes, however the immediate release of the mother and puppies seems to be a concern that takes precedence, and Miss. Urrutia Urena would like to pick them up as soon as possible and is willing to surrender the litter after they reach 8 weeks and has expressed she would be more willing to allow NBSA to assist in finding the others new homes so long as she is involved in the process and that the adoption is agreed to be open so that she can have the opportunity to remain in the dogs lives,
this is understandably a unique request however we ask NBAS to consider the information provided relating to ASD and willingness to offer compassion and understanding for this situation is affecting her would be greatly appreciated.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 3:35 AM
wrote:
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to share my story and explain why I believe the town ordinance relating to the number of dogs a home can have should be amended. Recently, animal control took the offspring from my dog, which I hold very close to my heart. I’m emotionally disabled, and working with my dogs is therapeutic for me.
I believe ordinances should be amended to focus on the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of dogs allowed. This would also help with the overpopulation in shelters and other animal control issues. More programs need to be made available for people like myself who want to retain their animals rather than putting them into
overcrowded shelters.
The current ordinance is limiting the love and care I can offer my animals. I’m certain there are others facing the same issue. I respectfully request the council consider amending the ordinance to focus more on the quality of care than the number of animals a person can have.
I believe that the town ordinances should be centered around the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of animals allowed for house with shelters being overpopulated and thousands of animals losing their lives every year to reasons relating to a lack of space and resources it only would seem logical that individuals be allowed to house more than four animals in their home as long as those animals are loved cared for insecure also though it is understandable that no one wants to hear excessive barking or smell excessive smells that come from dogs using the bathroom ordinances need to be a little more relaxed and understanding that these are animals living breathing creatures not something that you can just mold in force to conform to fit your desired needs if you don’t want to hear barking don’t get a dog if you don’t want to smell dog feces complaints made regarding animals are made too often and I believe that the town entertaining them is bias and unfair just to take all of the ordinances into mine for a brief second it would seem as though Windsor has become an anti-domestic animal town as it makes it difficult for individuals who are putting their time and energy into good use out to be criminals and the targets of different agency attacks.
Programs that claim to help an animals and their owners like spay and neuter programs need to be made actually be available for individuals I have tried for a year straight every month logging on to the website of the humane society of Sonoma county to get my dog spayed and neutered and the calendar that is provided on the website is always out at least 6 months this is a not matter no matter when I go on it is always the same thing I call the organizations in the surrounding area and everybody is booked out at least 9 months my question is is that with all the funding and grants that are handed out to these places where is that money going if it’s not going to
From: Kristina Owens
To: Jon Davis
Subject: REVISED: Memo
Date: Thursday, October 5, 2023 5:43:49 PM
Attachments:
Mike provided details and I added them to the memo.
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
From: Kristina Owens
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 4:35 PM
To: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Memo
Hi there,
I spoke with Code Enforcement, Brayden. He indicated he is tied up and will provide a summary tonight. Chief recognized the property and tenant names via email but was unable to provide a summary.
To be noted, Brayden was waiting to hear back from NBAS to add to his report for the Administrative Hearing and was unaware of the actions taken to date. Furthermore, I believe based on a comment from Brayden, the Chief should provide additional details to you in private.
Therefore, the attached memo is based on NBAS report and a phone call with Braydon.
Thank you,
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
From:
To: Michael Raasch
Cc: Sam Salmon
Subject: Threats
Date: Sunday, November 28, 2021 11:35:01 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
November 28, 2021
Windsor Police Chief Raasch and Mayor Salmon,
Sorry to bother you with this, but a resident of has threatened me twice for walking my dogs on leash behind his home on a public trail. One of my mutts peed there and by squatting, but he said she was “shitting” and demanded I pick the pee up then said “I’ve had enough of you and your type and I know where you live.”
The first time he treated me six months ago he and his family became abusive behind their fence on the trail because their German Shepherd kept barking at us. He told us to leave his property. I was not on his property. He told me at that time he knew where I live and I should be worried.
When I got home today from our walk, my spouse said a man can be seen on our front door cameras leaving his silver car in front of our house carrying a bag and emptying it on our stoop. It was dog poo. Not ours.
I showed the RING tape to an officer this Sunday morning. I also drove to the and there was the same car license parked in front.
This guy knows where I live because I sit in front of our , home on sunny days with the dogs regularly and can be seen easily from I fear the man and his threats.
Advice?
Best,
they added records that were not related to me in anyway to make them appear to be justified in coming after me
These were the first boys I trusted North Bay Animal Services with. click on them to see what they looked like the day they were taken and you will see what it was that made me start digging into the shelter.
when my boys came back home, they were sick and underweight. these are the first dogs NBAS claims to have taken but the truth is I was forced to give them up or risk my in laws losing their home. ‘\
right now you think its no big deal most of you think I deserve to have what is happening to me happen but that is because you only have one side of the story and most of you are unwilling to really hear mine but what happens when they have gone after everyone LIKE ME? you might be safe now but someday it will come down to you and them and who do you think they will choose then to sacrifice?
I have done nothing wrong I have done my best even with all the road blocks placed by the shelter the town and the police in their attempt to monopolize even now I have pleaded for the dogs to be find homes yet the shelter claims I have not surrendered them the reports timestamps prove that the reports were altered and were even written with wrong information.
I am not trying to force anyone to believe me blindly all I am asking is for you to put your opinions of me aside and review the FACTS with an open heart and see this for what is
and that is I started a rescue to help I learned on my own I built a team I made what I had work I poured everything I am and have into it I faced pushbacks from every direction because to allow me to sit at the table would itself prove that these shelters do not need more money to do better they need smaller salaries and they need more heart if their heart were truly in it they would be putting more energy into fixing their own wrongs not lying to the public trying to distract them by making me out to be a monster and them a hero
Subject: Contesting Citations and Request for Advance Deposit Hardship Waiver
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to formally contest the citation(s) issued by the town of Windsor on the behalf of the property owner,at 7064 Hastings Pl, along with any other responsible party.
It is imperative to highlight that the actions taken by personnel of the town of Windsor represent a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which safeguards personal privacy and protects individuals from unreasonable government intrusion into their persons, homes, businesses, and property.
Upon careful examination of the records released by the town of Windsor, it is evident that there was no probable cause and no warrant for any investigation conducted. Furthermore, any complaint mentioned in the records pertains to a property behind 7064 Hastings Pl, not the property in question. The misidentification of a 25 ft 5th wheel trailer parked behind 7064 Hastings Pl as a reason for accusing the owners of code violations is perplexing and baseless.
Moreover, it appears that there was collusion between the town of Windsor and North Bay Animal Services to fabricate false documentation and claims against the property in question, with the aim of manufacturing probable cause. Such actions constitute a violation of USC code 42 section 1983, which holds individuals accountable for depriving others of their constitutional rights while acting under the color of law.
It is worth noting that North Bay Animal Services has since retracted their involvement due to their unlawful actions, which were not in compliance with state and federal laws. However, the town of Windsor has neglected to address these violations, thereby allowing them to persist.
These unlawful and malicious actions not only put the property owners at risk of financial hardship but also violate the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which prohibits excessive fines. The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Bajakajian serves as a precedent, demonstrating that fines must be proportionate to the offense committed.
Furthermore, any evidence obtained through unlawful means, such as an unreasonable search and seizure, should be excluded from consideration, in accordance with the exclusionary rule. Therefore, any alleged evidence currently or planned to be used against the property owners of 7064 Hastings Pl should be deemed inadmissible.
Given the circumstances outlined above, I kindly request a waiver for the advance deposit hardship. The property owners, who are elderly and financially vulnerable, are already facing undue burden as a result of these citations and cannot afford to deposit additional funds.
Your prompt attention to this matter and fair consideration of our request are greatly appreciated.
On December 10, 2025, multiple outlets reported that Windsor Police seized 28 dogs from a Windsor home during what they described as a “probation compliance check.” The headlines were immediate and sensational: “28 dogs found in poor and unsafe conditions”, “abundant fecal matter”, “dirty garage”. But what the headlines didn’t ask and what the public deserves to ask is whether this was truly about animal welfare… or about silencing someone who has been outspoken about the failures of the Windsor shelter system and local authorities.
This blog post examines the narrative behind the narrative: the context, the timing, and the pattern of retaliation that small rescues and advocates often face when they challenge entrenched systems.
1. What the News Reported — and What It Didn’t
According to Windsor Police, the dogs were found in a garage with “soiled bedding,” “dirty water,” and “limited or no food”. These descriptions are dramatic but they are also standard boilerplate language used in nearly every animal‑seizure press release in California. They are not evidence of long‑term neglect; they are the language agencies use to justify immediate confiscation.
Notably:
The dogs were described as mixed‑breed terriers, including puppies the exact type of dogs commonly kept in temporary indoor holding areas by foster‑based rescues during transport, quarantine, or medical stabilization.
Police were not responding to a cruelty complaint. They were conducting a probation check unrelated to animal welfare.
The dogs were all alive, ambulatory, and not reported to be emaciated or medically critical. Only two were taken for veterinary evaluation.
This is not the profile of a cruelty case. This is the profile of a mass seizure event—the kind that conveniently generates headlines, funding, and political cover.
2. Why This Case Raises Red Flags
A. The Timing and Targeting Are Too Convenient
Christina Urrutia has been outspoken about:
Misconduct within the Windsor shelter system
Failures in animal care oversight
Procedural violations by local authorities
The lack of transparency in how Windsor Police and the Town of Windsor handle animal‑related cases
When someone publicly challenges a system, that system often responds not with dialogue, but with force.
B. Probation Checks Are Not Random
Police chose the moment of a probation check an environment where the resident has no ability to refuse entry, no ability to prepare, and no ability to protect themselves from narrative manipulation.
This is a classic tactic used when authorities want to control the optics.
C. The Language Used in Press Releases Is Designed to Convict in the Court of Public Opinion
Terms like “abundant fecal matter” and “dirty water” appear in nearly every animal‑seizure press release in the state. They are not measurements, not veterinary assessments, and not evidence of long‑term neglect.
They are PR phrases.
And they work because the public reacts emotionally, not critically.
3. The Missing Context: What Foster‑Based Rescues Actually Do
Foster‑based rescues often:
Intake large groups of dogs at once
Use garages or indoor spaces temporarily for quarantine
House dogs in crates for safety during medical stabilization
Experience short windows where cleaning, feeding, and intake overlap
None of this is cruelty. It is the reality of rescue work, especially when rescuing from high‑kill shelters, hoarding cases, or rural areas with no infrastructure.
The media did not ask:
Were these dogs newly arrived?
Were they in quarantine?
Were they awaiting transport?
Were they being held temporarily for safety?
Were they in the process of being cleaned, fed, or moved?
Because those questions would complicate the narrative.
4. The Power Imbalance: Small Rescues vs. Government Agencies
When a small rescue speaks out, they have:
No PR department
No taxpayer‑funded legal team
No police force
No municipal budget
No political protection
When a town or police department speaks out, they have:
Press officers
Legal counsel
Media relationships
The ability to seize animals
The ability to arrest
The ability to shape the narrative before the individual can even respond
This is not a fair fight. And it is not meant to be.
5. Making an Example Out of a Whistleblower
The Windsor shelter system and Windsor Police have been under scrutiny for years. A vocal critic—especially one with legal literacy, community support, and a track record of rescue work—is inconvenient.
So what do institutions do with inconvenient people?
They make an example of them.
They seize animals. They issue press releases. They create a public narrative before the truth can surface. They rely on the public’s emotional reaction to dogs in crates rather than the facts of rescue operations.
This is not about 28 dogs. This is about power, retaliation, and silencing dissent.
6. The Public Should Demand Answers
Before accepting the official narrative, the community should ask:
Why were 28 dogs seized without a prior welfare complaint?
Why was the media notified before the individual could respond?
Why were boilerplate “dirty conditions” phrases used instead of veterinary findings?
Why were the dogs not evaluated by independent vets before being taken?
Why is the Town of Windsor so quick to criminalize rescue work while ignoring its own shelter failures?
These questions matter because transparency matters.
Conclusion: This Case Is Bigger Than One Person
This is not just a story about dogs in a garage. This is a story about a town and police department using their power to punish someone who dared to speak out.
Until the public demands accountability, small rescues and advocates will continue to be targeted, silenced, and destroyed not because they harm animals, but because they expose the systems that do.
Point‑by‑Point Factual Rebuttal to the Windsor, CA “28 Dogs” Narrative
Below is a clean, factual, point‑by‑point rebuttal directly addressing each claim made in the news reports about the Windsor, CA seizure of 28 dogs. All factual statements from the articles are cited from the search results you triggered.
Point‑by‑Point Factual Rebuttal to the Windsor, CA “28 Dogs” Narrative
This rebuttal responds directly to the claims made in the KTVU KTVU FOX 2, CBS News CBS News, KRON4 KRON4, Hoodline Hoodline, and ABC7 ABC7 News reports. It highlights what was actually stated, what was not stated, and what the public should understand about rescue operations, due process, and the limitations of the police narrative.
1. “Police found 28 dogs in poor and unsafe conditions.”
None of the articles report veterinary findings confirming long‑term neglect, malnutrition, dehydration, or medical decline.
The descriptions (“abundance of fecal matter,” “dirty water,” “soiled bedding”) are boilerplate language used in nearly every California animal‑seizure press release.
No article reports:
Emaciation
Untreated disease
Critical medical emergencies
Evidence of intentional cruelty
This is not the profile of a cruelty case—it is the profile of a mass seizure justified through generalized language.
The public is being asked to accept guilt based on:
A probation check
A police press release
No independent evidence
Charges are not proof. They are part of the narrative.
Below is a clean, professional, legal‑tone factual defense followed by a side‑by‑side comparison table. Everything is written so you can paste it directly into your WordPress draft tab without modification.
LEGAL‑TONE FACTUAL DEFENSE
(Grounded strictly in what the news reports actually state, with citations.)
This statement provides a factual, evidence‑based response to the claims made by Windsor Police and the Town of Windsor regarding the December 2025 seizure of 28 dogs from a private residence. It is written in a legal‑appropriate tone, avoids speculation, and highlights the gaps, omissions, and inconsistencies in the publicly released information.
I. Lack of Evidence of Long‑Term Neglect
The police and media reports describe “poor and unsafe living conditions,” citing “abundance of fecal matter,” “soiled bedding,” “dirty water,” and “limited or no food available” CBS News. These descriptions are not veterinary findings, not quantified, and not supported by independent expert evaluation.
No article reports:
Emaciation
Dehydration
Untreated disease
Critical medical emergencies
Veterinary confirmation of chronic neglect
The only medical detail reported is that two dogs were taken for evaluationABC7 News—a normal occurrence in any rescue intake of 28 animals.
II. The Search Was Not an Animal‑Welfare Investigation
All outlets confirm the entry occurred during a probation compliance check, not an animal‑cruelty investigation KTVU FOX 2CBS NewsABC7 News.
This distinction is legally significant:
The resident could not refuse entry.
The timing and conditions were controlled entirely by law enforcement.
No prior animal‑welfare complaint is reported by any outlet.
Thus, the conditions observed represent a single moment in time, not evidence of ongoing neglect.
Whether the garage was a designated quarantine or intake area
Whether cleaning or feeding was in progress
Foster‑based rescues routinely use indoor spaces—including garages—for temporary holding, quarantine, medical stabilization, or transport staging. The mere presence of dogs in a garage does not constitute cruelty.
IV. Crating and Soiled Bedding Are Not Criminal Acts
Police reported that three dogs were crated with “heavily soiled bedding” CBS News. This is not evidence of abuse:
Crating is standard for safety, transport, and medical recovery.
Bedding can become soiled within minutes after feeding or water spills.
No duration or context is provided.
Without time‑stamped evidence, this claim cannot establish neglect.
V. “Commercial Kennel” Allegation Is Misapplied
One report states the resident was charged with “operating a commercial kennel without a license” ABC7 News.
However:
Foster‑based rescues are not commercial kennels.
California law distinguishes nonprofit rescue activity from for‑profit kennel operations.
No article states whether the dogs were personal pets, fosters, or rescue intakes.
This charge appears to be a classification error, not a factual finding.
VI. Charges Are Allegations, Not Findings
All reports confirm that the individual “faces charges” or was “arrested on suspicion” of cruelty KTVU FOX 2KRON4ABC7 News. None report:
A completed investigation
Veterinary testimony
Judicial findings
Independent expert review
Arrest and accusation do not constitute guilt.
SIDE‑BY‑SIDE COMPARISON: POLICE CLAIMS VS. RESCUE REALITIES
“Welcome to Behind the Kennel Doors, where we uncover the truth about animal services what shelters really are, what they’re not, and what life is like for the dogs who pass through them.”
“Every year, millions of dogs enter shelters. Not all of them make it out alive.”
When most people hear the word ‘animal shelter,’ they imagine a safe place. A refuge. A temporary stop on the way to a loving home. But the truth is far more complicated. Shelters are not sanctuaries. They are holding facilities often overcrowded, underfunded, and misunderstood. For the dogs inside, life is not filled with comfort or hope. It is filled with waiting. Waiting in kennels, waiting in fear, waiting for someone to see them before time runs out
Every shelter is different and has their own way of doing things, but a general rule is that dogs MUST be given a minimum of 72 hours before they are killed if the need to make space is there.
In many shelters, the harsh reality is that decisions about which dogs live and which dogs die often come down to perceived adoptability. It’s not always about need or fairness it’s about demand. Shelters weigh what the public is most likely to take home, who they believe has a better chance of being adopted quickly, and those judgments become the deciding factor. A young, small, or popular breed may be given more time, while seniors, large dogs, or stigmatized breeds may be euthanized simply because they’re harder to ‘get off the floor.’ In the end, customer demand shapes survival. and this is not how animal services was intended to be. instead this like so many other themes traditions, etc has been tainted by humans and interrupted in ways that convenance those interrupting the field of animal welfare.
Two Seniors Holding On… Praying This Isn’t Their Final Destination… begging for just one more chance at life. Code: #A587508
Female, approximately 11 years old Code: #A587575 Male, approximately 15 years old San Bernardino City Animal Shelter 333 Chandler Place San Bernardino, CA 92408 Email: sbcanimalshelter@sbcity.org Phone: (909) 998-4000 Both currently housed together in: Kennel V144
the dogs above have spent 15 years together; all they know is one another clearly their lives have been turned upside down and the only thing they have left to keep their own light on inside is each other yet here they are trapped in a shelter that holds only a 63 % save rate. this shelter also has openly admitted that they spend 60 % of their budget on salaries, and this is not including a vet or tech team. now let’s assume that they spend 20 % of what is left on a vet team at least one can hope and that’s not all that much, we are now left with just 30 % of the budget and with that 30% they need to hire a tech team and care for the animals in their care. I am going to let you finish this on your own with the hope that like me you will soon come to see how badly we as humans continue to fail the animals we claim to love. I am sure that like me many if not all of those who find themselves reading this do love animals so I am hoping that you hear what I am saying and that you don’t get caught up in a sudden need to waste time trying to defend yourself love is not all cupcakes and rainbows it sometimes is doing what is hard so that those we love are able to grow. the next thing I would like you to think about is what does love mean to you. when you say I love you or I love them or I love this or that what does that mean? what experience dose what and who you love differ from what and who you do not?
there are no wrong answers, and you do not have to share with us of course if you are willing to and want to you are more than welcome to leave a comment.
for myself love is a fondness of something or someone that exceeds the tolerance acceptance and enjoyment of what and who you like. when I say ” I love you” whether it’s to my spouse, kids, a family member, or a close friend what I am saying is ” you are a part of my life, and it’s purpose, I am truly thankful to have the honor of having our paths entangled and your presence goes into completing my overall fulfillment contentment and satisfaction with my existence here on earth.” it means that I care about your thoughts, feelings, needs, dreams, wants, likes, dislikes, fears, and I want to give back the feeling of completion, I want to help in any way I might be able to in order for you to reach your goals and dreams. it means I will respect you and treat you better than how I want to be treated, and it also means that I will always be 100% honest with you I will tell you when your actions are out of alignment with manifesting your heart’s true desires. it, means that if I have it, you have it. what is mine is available to you if a time comes that you might be in need, it means that I will be there when you need someone to vent to, someone to advocate for you someone to remind you of inner worth and get you back on track.
if this seems like we took a turn off somewhere rest assured we are right on track I promise. Before we move on and I share how this is fits into the overall message I really want to take some time to think about this entry and dig deep don’t rush into saying the first thing that comes to your mind.
thank you for you taking the time to read this thank you for showing up and for your willingness to hear what I have to say.
she went into the shelter with her little brother, he got adopted she was left behind alone and at risk of being killed for space. when I saw her for the first time my heart sank and I knew that I could not let her die I would have walked to where she was if I had to her face was all I thought about day and night I felt her pain I heard her cries and I felt her lost I wanted to mend her heart and soul I wanted to give her a reason to wag her tail again and I wanted to be a reason she felt love and loved again
her eyes tell the story, her story looking back over the pictures from then to now I love seeing the pain vanish I love seeing her light come back on and life start to shine through.
Slowly but surely Lady inched her way out of darkness, she would allow herself to trust a little more every day . the first time we saw her smile it was like the first time seeing a sunset. she came to us heartbroken and confused but she learned that she was safe she saw that we cared and she finally allowed herself to let go of that pain let her wall fall and catch her breath.
is life perfect? far from it but for lady life is whole again she was adopted by a couple who fell in love with her the moment they saw her and she fell in love with them just as hard, for a moment she had a new little brother and we got the chance to see a completely different dog. sadly her brother was shot and killed by Windsor Police in the town of Windsor but lady still has her mom and dad they need her as much as she needs they and no matter what anyone who doesn’t know their ass from a hole in the way says we stand by the belief that lady is right where she is meant to be with who she is meant to be with.
Windsor Town Manager Jon Davis said in a statement that the town is reviewing the Civil Grand Jury Report and will have more information as its official response is drafted and submitted.
The cities of Sebastopol and Cloverdale did not respond to a request for comment.
The city councils of all four NBAS contracting cities are required to file official responses to the grand jury’s findings and recommendations within 90 days.
From:
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 4:41 PM
To: Debora Fudge <dfudge@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Re:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
North Bay Animal Services in Petaluma came to my home when my dogs got out of the yard and took 5 of my dogs.
At the time, I was under the impression that I had no other choice but to give up my dogs. If
I knew, I had the choice to say no, I would have.
Later I spoke with Mark Scott the director of North Bay Animal Services and I feel that I was persuaded to sign a surrender agreement, Mark manipulated me by telling me if I didn’t do the right thing now, if I put up barriers then he could not help me and that I would end up losing everything and that he was trying to save me.
He said he just wanted to help me get them fixed and that I could find them homes as I was clear that I wanted the dogs I couldnt keep due to there being a limit on the number of dogs a house a can have to be homed with family and friends so that I could remain in their lives.
I am emotionally disabled and suffer from social anxiety, ptsd, aspergers, and ADD and verbal communication is one of my greatest struggles.
I feel that Mark tricked me by intentionally giving me misleading information so that I would agree to let him “help”
Since my dogs have been gone I have slipped into a depression that I am unable to shake, I email and call and neither are responded to.
I went to Petaluma to get my dogs and the shelter said that my dogs were in the back where the public does not have access to. I called the petaluma police department and the officers claimed to not have the authority to have North Bay Animal Services give me my dogs.
Mark at one point was on the phone and said that if I was calm I could see my dogs but
the shelter staff didnt not follow through and then told the police that the dogs were not there. Mark insisted that I go to windsor and talk to him I told him that there was nothing to talk about I wanted my dogs and that wasnt going to change. My disabilities are the barrier that makes verbal communication difficult and it is unfair to demand me to “push” through them and do as mark is asking.
My request is clear and firm I want my dogs I do not want them at North Bay the shelter has a lot of shady aspects and I do not want my dogs being the next death by mistake or any other possible misfortune outcome.
I feel that petaluma police were bias as they and Mark are in the same line of work and its like a club member pack. I feel that my disabilities made me an easy target and that were used against me to get me to allow mark to take my dogs,
Mark says a lot of good stuff and makes promises that sound like everything is going to be ok but there is no follow through and I do not feel comfortable with my animals in his care,
I want to appeal and will keep doing so until my dogs are returned whatever I need to do to get them back will be done,
I dont want to take the road to filing a law suit but if there is no action by the end of the week that will be my next move.
I have reached out to members of government and will be sending over copies of every email letter video and any other piece of evidence to the media.
I am not trying to be cause trouble I just want my dogs back with shelters being over filled and there being so many animals at risk of being killed I am unable to see why returning my dogs is so hard for mark to do. If resources are so limited why fight to spread yourself thinner the only thing I can think is that like any other business an animal shelter needs animals to in order to get funding and to gain the support of the community I went to mark before about two puppies that were found in a parking lot in lake county and he said that it was out of jurisdiction even though his organization services lake county as well he told me to basically tell the lady sorry and send the pups back with her because resources were so limited but then the following week went to a county he does not service using county transportation to get 12 dogs im not sure the number but it can be found in the newspaper because of course it was a nice touch and story for the public.
I just want my dogs and I won’t stop until I have them back. I will keep emailing and requesting audits, court records, background checks and other reports and I will share with the public everything I learn.
What is happening is not right and something needs to be done anybody of government that has the power to help and chooses to look the other way is guilty as well and will added to any lawsuit that may arise for being in conspiracy to abuse power under the color of law and acting in ways that cause severe mental distress to a disabled individual who didn’t have the mental ability to understand the situation and had no advocate, for learning of those disabilities and continuing to allow this cruel and unusual treatment.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 3:36 AM wrote:
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to share my story and explain why I believe the town ordinance relating to the number of dogs a home can have should be amended. Recently, animal control took the offspring from my dog, which I hold very close to my heart. I’m emotionally disabled, and working with my dogs is therapeutic for me.
I believe ordinances should be amended to focus on the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of dogs allowed. This would also help with the overpopulation
in shelters and other animal control issues. More programs need to be made available for people like myself who want to retain their animals rather than putting them into overcrowded shelters.
The current ordinance is limiting the love and care I can offer my animals. I’m certain there are others facing the same issue. I respectfully request the council consider amending the ordinance to focus more on the quality of care than the number of animals a person can have.
I believe that the town ordinances should be centered around the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of animals allowed for house with shelters being overpopulated and thousands of animals losing their lives every year to reasons relating to a lack of space and resources it only would seem logical that individuals be allowed to house more than four animals in their home as long as those animals are loved cared for insecure also though it is understandable that no one wants to hear excessive barking or smell excessive smells that come from dogs using the bathroom ordinances need to be a little more relaxed and understanding that these are animals living breathing creatures not something that you can just mold in force to conform to fit your desired needs if you don’t want to hear barking don’t get a dog if you don’t want to smell dog feces complaints made regarding animals are made too often and I believe that the town entertaining them is bias and unfair just to take all of the ordinances into mine for a brief second it would seem as though Windsor has become an anti-domestic animal town as it makes it difficult for individuals who are putting their time and energy into good use out to be criminals and the targets of different agency attacks.
Programs that claim to help an animals and their owners like spay and neuter programs need to be made actually be available for individuals I have tried for a year straight every month logging on to the website of the humane society of Sonoma county to get my dog spayed and neutered and the calendar that is provided on the website is always out at least 6 months this is a not matter no matter when I go on it is always the same thing I call the organizations in the surrounding area and everybody is booked out at least 9 months my question is is that with all the funding and grants that are handed out to these places where is that money going if it’s not going to
From: SCASDispatch
To:
Subject: FW: Question or Comment: Now, Duck(s)
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2020 8:37:28 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Message: You were most helpful when we needed to report our neighbor’s constantly-barking German shepherd dog. The dog has decreased in its barking, after you sent a letter to its owners. Now, our neighbor has purchased at least one domestic duck for their backyard. As duck hunters, we recognize the quackings of the duck(s). The German shepherd is still on the premises. We have 5400 square foot properties, which are considered small. Are duck(s) allowed in small, residential neighborhoods in Windsor? The Town of Windsor advised me to contact you with our question. I formerly lived on acreage in Sebastopol, and kept ducks, geese, chickens, sheep, a rabbit, one horse, and 33 bee hives, all of which I tended. I love animals, but it seems strange to have “farm” animals on small, city properties which are separated from one another by ten feet. Thank you for your response.
From: Debora Fudge
To: Jon Davis
Subject: Fwd:
Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 9:14:00 PM
Are you aware of all of this?
Deb
From:
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 4:41 PM
To: Debora Fudge <dfudge@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Re:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
This is a picture of my dogs burnt paw pads. It happened when NBAS picked her up just a few houses down from where she lives, NBAS knows very well were she lives I also made it home just after they loaded her up and drove away I called the notice left by NBAS on the door and Officer Dunahoo sorry if I misspelled it told me I would have to go to petaluma to pick her up the next day.
Below are photos of my other dogs that at some point were in the care of NBAS the picture were you can see the black dogs ribs was taken the day I went and finally after a 3 month fight I got back from them.
Below that you will see pictures of the same dog before he went to NBAS
Next is a picture of a third dog first before NBAS and the last fire of him while with NBAS
while I was gathering everything for my records I put in a request to the town of windsor for records and to ask for help with the situations involving my dogs. when I got the records back there were things that had nothing to do with me BUT when looking at it overall it at a glance looks like enough to be PROBALE CAUSE
I have never been with CALPAWS I have never owned a Shepard or husky. I did not live in windsor full time that year and I had not gotten into rescue yet.
P Please consider the environment before printing this email
From: Rosa Reynoza <rreynoza@townofwindsor.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 6:15 AM
To: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Fwd:
Good morning.
Can you look into this?
Please share the ordinance with me at our next meet up.
Thank you
Get Outlook for iOS
From:
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 3:36 AM
To: Rosa Reynoza <rreynoza@townofwindsor.com>
Subject:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to share my story and explain why I believe the town ordinance relating to the number of dogs a home can have should be amended. Recently, animal control took the offspring from my dog, which I hold very close to my heart. I’m emotionally disabled, and working with my dogs is therapeutic for me.
I believe ordinances should be amended to focus on the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of dogs allowed. This would also help with the overpopulation in shelters and other animal control issues. More programs need to be made available for people like myself who want to retain their animals rather than putting them into overcrowded shelters.
The current ordinance is limiting the love and care I can offer my animals. I’m certain there are others facing the same issue. I respectfully request the council consider amending the ordinance to focus more on the quality of care than the number of animals a person can have.
I believe that the town ordinances should be centered around the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of animals allowed for house with shelters being overpopulated and thousands of animals losing their lives every year to reasons relating to a lack of space and resources it only would seem logical that individuals be allowed to house more than four animals in their home as long as those animals are loved cared for insecure also though it is understandable that no one wants to hear excessive barking or smell excessive smells that come from dogs using the bathroom ordinances need to be a little more relaxed and understanding that these are animals living breathing creatures not something that you can just mold in force to conform to fit your desired needs if you don’t want to hear barking don’t get a dog if you don’t want to smell dog feces complaints made regarding animals are made too often and I believe that the town entertaining them is bias and unfair just to take all of the ordinances into mine for a brief second it would seem as though Windsor has become an anti-domestic animal town as it makes it difficult for individuals who are putting their time and energy into good use out to be criminals and the targets of different agency attacks.
Programs that claim to help an animals and their owners like spay and neuter programs need to be made actually be available for individuals I have tried for a year straight every month logging on to the website of the humane society of Sonoma county to get my dog spayed and neutered and the calendar that is provided on the website is always out at least 6 months this is a not matter no matter when I go on it is always the same thing I call the organizations in the surrounding area and everybody is booked out at least 9 months my question is is that with all the funding and grants that are handed out to these places where is that money going if it’s not going to
THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY EMAIL SYSTEM. Warning: If you don’t know this email sender or the email is unexpected, do not click any web links, attachments, and never give out your user ID or password.
From: Mickie Tagle
To: Ken MacNab
Cc: Ruben Martinez
Subject: RE: North Bay Animal Services – Pending Complaint from
Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 5:11:35 PM
Hello Ken,
Mark’s ready for a call with us any time to review the history of barking dog complaint. Also, all is going well. Mark and his team are eager to start as soon as yesterday! Mark joked about being ready to go with or without the contract. Case in point, a Windsor resident already called today to ask if they would take kittens. The county phone line just kept ringing and the local vets wouldn’t take them. Mark said, yes and NBAS is now taking care of the kitties. With all that said, we’re on track for NBAS to take over and start by July 1st.
Following is what’s on our list of action items that per Mark, it’s not necessary to complete by the 1st:
1. From Windsor:
a. Copy of executed contract. (Jule is on it and near the end of completing the process) b. Replace info on our website from county to NBAS. (I’ll take care of it.)
2. From the County:
a. Transfer of licenses from the county. (I’m on a call with them tomorrow. Allegedly, it’s a complicated process.)
b. Photo of existing license tags to ensure NBAS gets the same style for consistency. (I’m on it.)
c. Success number of license tags. (I’m on it.)
3. From NBAS:
a. Marketing materials – NBAS has a great team of volunteer marketing folks already in the works re: announcement to the websites and social media; FAQs/Brochures re: here’s how you can license a dog, here’s where to neuter; Mark’s happy to share all their marketing materials with us as they create it for our review, edits, and creative input.
b. Windsor Vets – Mark reached out to one already but vets they didn’t seem interested. Mark said that due to shelter in place, lots of folks are taking their pets to vets. Vets are overwhelmed and not taking on more clients. Maybe now is not the time to reach out. He’ll give it some time before he reaches out again.
c. Windsor Animal Control Officer – Mark’s already got someone ready to start but he’s got an ad out for another one. Ideally, he would like to hire a bilingual Windsor resident. He’ll give us the link to the job posting, in case we wish to share on our social media.
FYI
Respectfully,
Mickie Tagle
COVID-19 Emergency Operations Center – Emergency Coordinator, Liaison, & Public Information Officer
Subject: North Bay Animal Services – Pending Complaint from
Hi Mickie
Councilmember Salmon asked about the status of transition to our new animal services vendor. I shared last I heard the process had begun and was off to a good start. Can you please give me an update I can share.
ALSO – has had a long-standing concern about a barking dog near his home. He indicated he is waiting for NBAS to assume responsibilities to make his next complaint. We may want to sit down with the Chief and NBAS to give them a heads up and some history. If the Chief can access County animal control records that might be helpful.
Ken
From: Patrick Streeter
To: Jon Davis
Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Other Question or Concern
Date: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 9:36:49 AM
Attachments:
Complaint forms attached – these are confidential.
Patrick N. Streeter, AICP | Community Development Director
Town of Windsor |9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg. 400|Windsor, CA 95492 707-838-1000 Main via Text or Phone | 707-838-5313 Direct| 707 838-7349 Fax http://www.townofwindsor.com
From: Patrick Streeter
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 9:33 AM
To: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Other Question or Concern
Yes, we have a complaint that was filed 8/15/23. Following inspection, the following violations were identified:
Substandard conditions / junk and rubbish / human occupied RV & structures
A Preliminary Notice was posted on the property, and it has been scheduled for an administrative hearing to take place on 10/11/23.
Patrick N. Streeter, AICP | Community Development Director
Town of Windsor |9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg. 400|Windsor, CA 95492 707-838-1000 Main via Text or Phone | 707-838-5313 Direct| 707 838-7349 Fax http://www.townofwindsor.com
From: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 9:17 AM
To: Patrick Streeter <pstreeter@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: Other Question or Concern
To: Town Clerk Distribution Group <dist_townclerk@townofwindsor.com> Subject: Online Form Submittal: Other Question or Concern
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Other Question or Concern
Do you have a question or concern, but not sure which Department to ask? Let us know and we will direct your question to the appropriate Department.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Physical Address if
applicable
Question or Concern file a grievance against multiple parties, one being a neighbor who is a law enforcement officer, and another against the town of
Windsor. there is a long history of tension, harassment, and
resentment between officer McCracken and myself and started
off in a negative manor for reasons unknown to me. from the first
interaction between the two of us he has always been hostel
yelling and swearing about my dog that would get out and ended
up being poisioned when i had filed a complaint against him he
reacted in a childish way telling my mother in law that “:
went to my job and got me in trouble so im not talking to her
anymore if that dog gets out again it will be an issue that i will
deal with in my way”at the time the fence our properties share
needed to be redone as his grandmother the last owner of the
house didnt respond to our bringing it needing to be done up so
my mother in law went ahead and paid to have the fence done
feel that the town’s role in all of this and it’s position is bias unfair
and prejudice i feel that the town in acting on the behalf of a
fellow civil servant and treating myself as well as those who live
in the household unfair and unjust, i have file many complaints
against windsor pd for harassment violations of civil rights and
liberties and for abusing their power under the color of law which
i now feel the town of windsor is doing also after 30 years now
code enforcement is accusing the owners of violations
Attach Document Field not completed.
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Hi Mark,
Following up on this complaint. Please call me.
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
From: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 10:03 AM
To: Animal Services (mark@northbayanimalservices.org) <mark@northbayanimalservices.org> Cc: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Windsor Animal Services – Complaint
Hello,
The Town received a concern regarding barking and sanitary conditions at . Based on the complaint from , the resident fosters animals, barking occurs all day until the dog is let inside, sanitary conditions have become an issue for neighbors to sit outside, and lastly, the number of permanent animals is 5+.
Can you let me know the steps to take to report and request a visit to the location? Do I just send an email to you or report in another form?
Thank you,
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
provided that such dog has been vaccinated consistent with the requirements of thissection and its owner presents proof of such vaccination upon demand and furtherprovided that such dog is confined on the premises of the person in charge of it while inthe Town except when being groomed, trained, bred, shown, exhibited, or in competition.
3-4-1400 – Mandatory Spay or Neutering for All Dogs at Large.
Except as provided in subsections (a) through (g) of this section, all owners cited for dogsrunning at large for violation ofSection 3-4-1025 shall have their dog spayed and neuteredat the owner’s expense.
a. Dogs documented as having been appropriately trained and actually being used bypublic law enforcement agencies for law enforcement activities, or such dogs designatedas breeding stock by an appropriate agency or organized approved by the Animal ControlOfficer after consultation with knowledgeable professionals;
b. Dogs documented as having been appropriately trained and actually being used asan assistance dog, such as a service dog, guide dog, signal dog, or social dog, orsuch dogs designated as breeding stock by an appropriate agency or organizationapproved by the Animal Control Officer after consultation with knowledgeableprofessionals;
c. Dogs documented as having been appropriately trained and actually being used bysearch and rescue agencies for search and rescue activities, or such dogsdesignated as breeding stock by an appropriate agency or organization approvedby the director after consultation with knowledgeable professionals;
d. Dogs certified by a licensed veterinarian as having a health reason for not beingspayed/neutered;
e.
Dogs which are appropriately trained and actually being used for herding of other animals,or as livestock guardian dogs, hunting dogs, or such dogs designated as breeding stockby an appropriate agency or organization approved by the Animal Control Officer afterconsultation with knowledgeable professionals;
f.
Dogs boarded in a licensed kennel or a business, which boards such animals forprofessional training or resale;
g.
Dogs which are registered with the American Kennel Club, United Kingdom Kennel Club,and/or American Dog Breeders Association Incorporated and trained and kept for thepurpose of show, field trials and agility trials.
3-4-1405 – Mandatory Spay or Neutering of All Pit Bulls.
No person shall own, harbor, or keep within the Town, a pit bull over the age of four (4)months, which has not been spayed or neutered, except as provided in Sections3-4-1400(a) through (g).
3-4-1025 – Dogs At Large Prohibited—Exceptions.
No person shall cause, permit, or allow any dog to run at large upon any public street orother public place, or upon any private property or premises other than those of the owneror other person in control of such dog, nor shall any person cause, permit, or allow anydog to be upon any public street or other public place unless the dog is restrained by asubstantial leash, except:
a. When such dog is assisting a law enforcement officer in the performance of police work.
b. When such dog is assisting a duly authorized person in an official search and rescue operation.
c.When such dog is assisting the owner in working, herding, or controlling livestock.
d. When such dog is assisting the owner in hunting on private property with the consent of the owner, lessee or other person in control thereof.
e. When such dog is participating in a dog training class, exhibition or competition, or an ongoing training program related thereto, under the direction and control of a dog trainer or other qualified person on public property with the consent of the owner or operator of the grounds or facilities, or on private property with the consent of the owner, lessee or other person in control thereof.
f. When such dog is accompanying the owner or other person in control of such dog on private property with the consent of the owner, lessee, or other person in control thereof.
Mark Scott
Executive Director
North Bay Animal Services
mark@northbayanimalservices.org
707-364-9554
From: Kristina Owens
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 3:32 PM
To: Animal Services (mark@northbayanimalservices.org)
Subject: Windsor Case
Hi Mark,
I wanted to provide my email address to push this item to the top of your inbox.
If you could respond with a quick recap and documentation regarding , I would appreciate it.
I will follow up with Code Enforcement and the Windsor Police Department as well. Unfortunately, I was directed not to forward the email submitted to Councilmember Fudge.
In the meantime, if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Thank you,
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
Subject: RE: Windsor Hastings Place Case
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
Hi Kristina,
What’s the address on and what is the person(s) name(s)?
From: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 3:55 PM
To: Michael Raasch <mraasch@townofwindsor.com>
Cc: Kristina Owens <kmowens@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: FW: Windsor Hastings Place Case
EXTERNAL
Hi Mike,
Council and the Mayor received an email regarding a code enforcement issue on . I assume it is without getting verification from Mark Scott – animal control. Based on the email, North Bay Animal Services tricked the resident into surrendering her animals while Mark Scott states otherwise.
Furthermore, Mark states that a scheduled court hearing is coming up and being handled by Town Code Enforcement. Next email to Robert Smith and his crew.
Do you have any information regarding this person or visits to the property on Hastings that will assist with a memo I need to present to the Council by Friday?
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
From: Kristina Owens
Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2023 3:33 PM
To: Animal Services (mark@northbayanimalservices.org) <mark@northbayanimalservices.org> Subject: Windsor Case
Hi Mark,
I wanted to provide my email address to push this item to the top of your inbox.
If you could respond with a quick recap and documentation regarding , I would appreciate it.
I will follow up with Code Enforcement and the Windsor Police Department as well. Unfortunately, I was directed not to forward the email submitted to Councilmember Fudge.
In the meantime, if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me. Thank you,
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY EMAIL SYSTEM. Warning: If you don’t know this email sender or the email is unexpected,
do not click any web links, attachments, and never give out your user ID or password.
THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF THE SONOMA COUNTY EMAIL SYSTEM. Warning: If you don’t know this email sender or the email is unexpected,
do not click any web links, attachments, and never give out your user ID or password.
From:
To: Rosa Reynoza
Subject: Re:
Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 1:37:45 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
This email is on behalf of who is the legal owner of the following dogs: six lab puppies aged between one year and five months, as well as six three-week-old puppies. 6 puppiesThe purpose of this letter is to inform you that the
surrender agreement previously signed with North Bay Animal Services (NAS) is to be considered null and void.
It has come to our attention that the surrender agreement was signed under circumstances that infringed upon the rights of the owner, who lacks the mental capacity to understand the implications of such an agreement. Additionally, their caregiver, who serves as a witness, was not present during the signing, further raising concerns about the validity of the decision to surrender the animals.
According to the CDC individuals with ASD operate in ways that differ from those without ASD, from the way they communicate, interact and learn, Usually there is not physical detector to a person who has ASD and the abilities of these individuals vary significantly, some may have strong communication skills either in verbal p or written, some need more help than others in day to day activities some may live on their own and some may need to live in supportive housing
People with ASD are usually known to stop learning new skills after the age of 24 mos some may learn new skills and then lose them, causing them to need to relearn them and that can be very stressful on the person.
Diagnosis for ASD can be difficult as there are no tests to test a person.
There are however common signs of those who have ASD ranging from emotional behaviors and reactions to communication skills to learning abilities. Not all people with ASD show all the same signs, some are higher functioning and ASD shows up differently in males and females. ASD individuals may have other
conditions like anxiety, depression, or ADHD. the attention of healthcare providers because they also have conditions such as anxiety, depression, or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, which occur more often in people with ASD than in people without ASD.
People with ASD have behaviors or interests that can seem unusual. These behaviors or interests set ASD apart from conditions defined by problems with social communication and interaction. It is important to note that a person with ASD might not react the same way in different situations and may have an easier time interacting with some people more than others, they may start off seeming ok then suddenly get overstimulated and shut down or even have a meltdown.
Examples of restricted or repetitive behaviors and interests related to ASD can includeRepeats words or phrases over and over (called echolalia
Gets upset by minor changes
Has obsessive interests
Must follow certain routines
Flaps hands, rocks body, or spins self in circles
Has unusual reactions to the way things sound, smell, taste, look, or feel other related characteristics.
Gastrointestinal issues (for example, constipation)
Unusual mood or emotional reactions
Anxiety, stress, or excessive worry
Lack of fear or more fear than expected
Considering these factors, we request the immediate release of the lab puppies as secured by the voiding of the surrender agreement between and NAS. We expect North Bay Animal Services to uphold the laws that protect the rights of individuals with disabilities and to act accordingly in this matter.
We understand that some of the dogs need new homes, however the immediate release of the mother and puppies seems to be a concern that takes precedence, and Miss. Urrutia Urena would like to pick them up as soon as possible and is willing to surrender the litter after they reach 8 weeks and has expressed she would be more willing to allow NBSA to assist in finding the others new homes so long as she is involved in the process and that the adoption is agreed to be open so that she can have the opportunity to remain in the dogs lives,
this is understandably a unique request however we ask NBAS to consider the information provided relating to ASD and willingness to offer compassion and understanding for this situation is affecting her would be greatly appreciated.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 3:35 AM
wrote:
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to share my story and explain why I believe the town ordinance relating to the number of dogs a home can have should be amended. Recently, animal control took the offspring from my dog, which I hold very close to my heart. I’m emotionally disabled, and working with my dogs is therapeutic for me.
I believe ordinances should be amended to focus on the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of dogs allowed. This would also help with the overpopulation in shelters and other animal control issues. More programs need to be made available for people like myself who want to retain their animals rather than putting them into
overcrowded shelters.
The current ordinance is limiting the love and care I can offer my animals. I’m certain there are others facing the same issue. I respectfully request the council consider amending the ordinance to focus more on the quality of care than the number of animals a person can have.
I believe that the town ordinances should be centered around the quality of care of an animal rather than the number of animals allowed for house with shelters being overpopulated and thousands of animals losing their lives every year to reasons relating to a lack of space and resources it only would seem logical that individuals be allowed to house more than four animals in their home as long as those animals are loved cared for insecure also though it is understandable that no one wants to hear excessive barking or smell excessive smells that come from dogs using the bathroom ordinances need to be a little more relaxed and understanding that these are animals living breathing creatures not something that you can just mold in force to conform to fit your desired needs if you don’t want to hear barking don’t get a dog if you don’t want to smell dog feces complaints made regarding animals are made too often and I believe that the town entertaining them is bias and unfair just to take all of the ordinances into mine for a brief second it would seem as though Windsor has become an anti-domestic animal town as it makes it difficult for individuals who are putting their time and energy into good use out to be criminals and the targets of different agency attacks.
Programs that claim to help an animals and their owners like spay and neuter programs need to be made actually be available for individuals I have tried for a year straight every month logging on to the website of the humane society of Sonoma county to get my dog spayed and neutered and the calendar that is provided on the website is always out at least 6 months this is a not matter no matter when I go on it is always the same thing I call the organizations in the surrounding area and everybody is booked out at least 9 months my question is is that with all the funding and grants that are handed out to these places where is that money going if it’s not going to
From: Kristina Owens
To: Jon Davis
Subject: REVISED: Memo
Date: Thursday, October 5, 2023 5:43:49 PM
Attachments:
Mike provided details and I added them to the memo.
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
From: Kristina Owens
Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 4:35 PM
To: Jon Davis <jdavis@townofwindsor.com>
Subject: Memo
Hi there,
I spoke with Code Enforcement, Brayden. He indicated he is tied up and will provide a summary tonight. Chief recognized the property and tenant names via email but was unable to provide a summary.
To be noted, Brayden was waiting to hear back from NBAS to add to his report for the Administrative Hearing and was unaware of the actions taken to date. Furthermore, I believe based on a comment from Brayden, the Chief should provide additional details to you in private.
Therefore, the attached memo is based on NBAS report and a phone call with Braydon.
Thank you,
Kristina Owens
Government Operations Manager|Town of Windsor
9291 Old Redwood Highway, Bldg 400
Windsor, CA 95492
Office: (707) 838-1100|Cell: (707) 836-5313
Email: kmowens@townofwindsor.com
Office Hours: Mon. – Thurs. 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
From:
To: Michael Raasch
Cc: Sam Salmon
Subject: Threats
Date: Sunday, November 28, 2021 11:35:01 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.
November 28, 2021
Windsor Police Chief Raasch and Mayor Salmon,
Sorry to bother you with this, but a resident of has threatened me twice for walking my dogs on leash behind his home on a public trail. One of my mutts peed there and by squatting, but he said she was “shitting” and demanded I pick the pee up then said “I’ve had enough of you and your type and I know where you live.”
The first time he treated me six months ago he and his family became abusive behind their fence on the trail because their German Shepherd kept barking at us. He told us to leave his property. I was not on his property. He told me at that time he knew where I live and I should be worried.
When I got home today from our walk, my spouse said a man can be seen on our front door cameras leaving his silver car in front of our house carrying a bag and emptying it on our stoop. It was dog poo. Not ours.
I showed the RING tape to an officer this Sunday morning. I also drove to the and there was the same car license parked in front.
This guy knows where I live because I sit in front of our , home on sunny days with the dogs regularly and can be seen easily from I fear the man and his threats.
Advice?
Best,
For the Town of Windsor to say they did not know anything about what was happening at NBAS is an unture statement.
what you just read were records that were sent in response to my records request. some items have nothing to do with me 1) I moved to Windsor in 2022 slowly and didn’t consider myself to LIVING in Windsor until early 2023. my the puppies that were the center of the situation were born February 2022.
